Page 203 of 598 FirstFirst ... 103153193201202203204205213253303 ... LastLast
Results 4,041 to 4,060 of 11959

Thread: Post pics of inspirational S-bodies

  1. #4041
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    511
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDMgravy. View Post
    The only thing that lets it down is the bodge it and scarper rear pull. Im sure the only reason its noticeable is because the rest of the thing is spot on.
    I agree, you've got a keen eye but now its blatantly obvious to me.. I think I can even see cracked paint..

    ..Rest of the car is Awesome

  2. #4042
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    lowestoft
    Posts
    3,626
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDMgravy. View Post
    Got my mits on some more pics of that '15, sure you guys wont mind seeing some different angles!











    i so need those wheels!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. #4043
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    You so need to not quote a post full of images!

  4. #4044
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    East London/Essex
    Posts
    5,657
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JulesS14200 View Post
    What were the width/offset on the fronts?


    Rear 18x13 ET-10

    Front 18x10.5 ET+12

  5. #4045
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Peterborough
    Posts
    4,174
    Rides
    0
    200jim - get out.

    Quail - I usually find our tastes are in alignment. However on this instance I put to you good sir........it needs staggered wheels - fronts look too big. Are they 19"s??!

  6. #4046
    Guest archenemy.co.uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Herts
    Posts
    13,008
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDMgravy. View Post
    The only thing that lets it down is the bodge it and scarper rear pull. Im sure the only reason its noticeable is because the rest of the thing is spot on.
    totally agree, thats a shocking mess

  7. #4047
    Guest Quail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    14,371
    Rides
    0
    I can't tell if they're 19s, I'm on my phone. I don't reckon the fronts look too big though, newer cars seem to pull off 19s OK. I haven't seen TEs with that much lip either - maybe an option with larger wheels?

    Saying that 18/19 stagger = gangster.

    EDIT - according to zilvia they are 19s, and they look big in the side on shot because of the 17mm lens
    Last edited by Quail; 20-07-2009 at 22:23.

  8. #4048
    Guest DREAD13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sidcup, Kent
    Posts
    4,218
    Rides
    0
    Damn that S15 is the shit, I want one now(like a little kid)

  9. #4049
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    rugby
    Posts
    1,572
    Rides
    0
    Fantastic looking car ,but is it me or , as soon as the rear suspension is compressed that lovely volk wheel f*cks-up the wheel arch .!!!

  10. #4050
    Guest Pantera Chris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    East Anglia
    Posts
    4,572
    Rides
    0
    Dare I say it. The rear is too low. Id rather have a usable, daily car that looks that good. Especially on UK roads!

  11. #4051
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    rugby
    Posts
    1,572
    Rides
    0
    Yep i agree , even if the inside of that arch is hammered to perfection that rim is gonna do a great job of re-arranging that arch lip . if not its ssssssssssooooooooooooooooooooo close .

  12. #4052
    Guest JDMgravy.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    639
    Rides
    0
    I think running the suspension super stiff is the price you pay for hardcore fitment! It's a good thing it aint a UK car eh!

  13. #4053
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Peterborough
    Posts
    4,174
    Rides
    0
    I'm fairly sure your wrong, as the suspension compresses the top of the wheel travels inwards - hence why this doesn't rub* -



    *OK it does rub but what I said is still true.

  14. #4054
    Guest Si's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zanussi service centre
    Posts
    39,280
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jord View Post
    Surely not dude? Fitment is perfect. Wheel in line with edge of fender.
    Yup, I prefer a bit more pokey outyness than that - I 'd honestly prefer it if it was maybe 10mm further out, and I reckon the fact that raising the rear by a few mm to gain the clearance (from the compression tuck) may actually help balance the stance.
    Hell, I reckon it it was raised 10mm the wheel might actually come out enough for my liking.

    Too much camber for me too.

  15. #4055
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    bedford
    Posts
    3,861
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jord View Post
    Surely not dude? Fitment is perfect. Wheel in line with edge of fender.
    yup, I that car! In my eyes tyres look horrible and should be covered as much as possible, especially between the 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock positions on a wheel (does that make sense?)

    Where can you get cheap 19's in man sizes?

  16. #4056
    Guest Cloudy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    At the bar with the ladies!
    Posts
    5,514
    Rides
    0
    Looks ok but the rear wheels don't stick out enough (plus looks too low) and the rear arches look like they've been attacked by a 4 year old boy with his daddy's hammer

  17. #4057
    Guest Si's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zanussi service centre
    Posts
    39,280
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt_T View Post
    yup, I that car! In my eyes tyres look horrible and should be covered as much as possible, especially between the 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock positions on a wheel (does that make sense?)

    Where can you get cheap 19's in man sizes?
    See, I'm the opposite, I hate that look - I hate the way it takes away from the shape of the rear tyres, and takes it away from being a sweeping circle into a weird squadgy shape - Don't get me wrong, I don't want to see all the tyre and dollops of inner arch, but I just think that a bit of tyre makes it look more cohesive.

    I also think that it sucks when the amount of tyre visible on front and rear is so noticeably different.

    Then again, that's all personal taste

  18. #4058
    Guest
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,374
    Rides
    0
    More proof that oversized wheels are king of the fail hill. That looks silly, despite the absolute awesomeness of the wheels. I bet it would be totally different if you fitted them to a 350Z. I think (if I understand Si right) that I agree with him about rear arch shape. It looks pants.

    Ace wheels in silly size + Ace Car = Ultimate Fail

  19. #4059
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    I'm finding it hard to see what's to get excited about anyway - it's another stock body car with massive wheels on it and nothing else.

    The brakes look pathetic inside the oversized wheels, the arches are horrendously pikey spec (which I could approve of if the rest of the car wasn't trying to be so clean) and the car generally looks like it's trying too hard.

    17/18s rather than 19s and some more work and it would be decent. As it is it reminds me of the "internet legend" status that Honda boys go for

  20. #4060
    Guest Pantera Chris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    East Anglia
    Posts
    4,572
    Rides
    0
    its not a stock body kit is it.

    Agree with wheels being too big. I like to see tyres as well. I nice design of tyre can really set the rims off.

    Anyway white S15s with white wheels are sooooooo much WIN.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •